Ribbon Banner

Go Back   V6 Performance.net Forums > GENERAL DISCUSSION > GENERAL AUTO DISCUSSION > HID/LIGHTS/RETROFITS
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Advertise on V6P.net


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old November 2nd, 2005, 10:27 PM   #1
OwAce
indoctidiscant
 
OwAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 3,797
Trader Rating: (6)
Send a message via AIM to OwAce
Woot Woot Retros Legal!!!

SEMA Prevails on Motor Vehicle Lighting Rule; NHTSA Alters Interpretation on Enhanced Replacement Headlamp Systems

WASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 1, 2005--Following a challenge by the Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA), the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has withdrawn a controversial interpretation of the federal lighting standard. SEMA disputed NHTSA's constitutional and statutory authority to prohibit vehicle headlamp replacement systems that are different than the headlamps and components which came with the original vehicle. The agency's latest action reverses this ruling.


In a Nov. 1, 2005, notice published in the Federal Register, NHTSA agreed with SEMA that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 108 is a performance standard that allows for different types of replacement headlamp systems, lamps and sources so long as the system meets the photometry and functionality requirements of the standard. It had been NHTSA's contention that replacement headlamps must comply with all applicable photometry requirements using the same light source as the original equipment. This interpretation would have prohibited, for example, replacing a halogen-based system with high-intensity discharge (HID) headlamps that otherwise meet all requirements of FMVSS 108.

"NHTSA's reversal is wholly consistent with the statutory requirement that replacement lighting equipment meet an objective performance standard. We applaud the agency for issuing this revised ruling," said SEMA President and CEO Chris Kersting. "A policy limiting the consumer's choice of design runs contrary to long-standing precedent, is beyond authority as delegated by Congress and could have threatened other equipment beyond lighting in the future. We are pleased that by acting on our members' behalf, we were able to overturn this policy."

NHTSA first issued its controversial interpretation in 2003 as a draft opinion letter subject to public comment. None of the 25 organizations and businesses that commented agreed with NHTSA's proposal that replacement equipment conform to the standard in the same manner as the original equipment. Instead, commenters argued that aftermarket manufacturers should be allowed to certify replacement lighting equipment under FMVSS No. 108 in such manner as complies with the performance standard it sets forth. Despite these recommendations, NHTSA stuck with its position and published a final opinion letter in October 2004. SEMA immediately petitioned the agency to reconsider its action.

"SEMA continues to stand for the right to responsibly accessorize, modify, and improve vehicles with enhanced aftermarket lighting," said SEMA Chairman Mitch Williams. "Enhanced headlamp lighting systems improve safety aspects of the vehicle and can be fully compliant with all relevant federal standards. SEMA vigorously opposed this interpretation of a long-standing regulation. It threatened to inhibit many legitimate companies who are in the business of improving vehicle lighting to the benefit of the motoring public. SEMA welcomes NHTSA's reversal and will continue to work with the agency to ensure fair and accurate implementation of this new interpretation."

Founded in 1963, SEMA represents the $32 billion specialty automotive industry of 6,466 member companies. It is the authoritative source for research, data, trends and market growth information for automakers and the specialty auto products industry. The industry provides appearance, performance, comfort, convenience and technology products for passenger and recreational vehicles. For more information contact SEMA at 1575 S. Valley Vista Dr., Diamond Bar, CA 91765-0910; call 909-396-0289; or visit www.sema.org and www.enjoythedrive.com.
OwAce is offline  
Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Google Submit to Yahoo! This Submit to Technorati Submit to StumbleUpon
Reply With Quote
Old November 2nd, 2005, 10:37 PM   #2
Hongda
I Jumped Off Da Bandwagon
 
Hongda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Jose,CA
Posts: 2,208
Trader Rating: (4)
Hongda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2nd, 2005, 10:39 PM   #3
Raddy21
Registered User
 
Raddy21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 1,137
Trader Rating: (5)
so HIDs are legal also as long as they comply with NHTSA?
Raddy21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2nd, 2005, 10:41 PM   #4
xjdMb16a2six
7th Gen ACcord
 
xjdMb16a2six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: socal
Posts: 3,660
Trader Rating: (11)
wait so refrofit are legal or HID KIT???
xjdMb16a2six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2nd, 2005, 10:42 PM   #5
Kiet
keepin' it OG
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 10,148
Trader Rating: (49)
Send a message via AIM to Kiet
woot. pretty sure adding LED's wouldnt be a problem too.

Too Late.. owell...
__________________


KIET

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Kiet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2nd, 2005, 10:46 PM   #6
OwAce
indoctidiscant
 
OwAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 3,797
Trader Rating: (6)
Send a message via AIM to OwAce
previously ANY alteration of the stock headlamps was illegal. now as long as it meets the photometric (or something of that sort) geometry of the original stock lamp its perfectly lega.
OwAce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2nd, 2005, 10:52 PM   #7
Raddy21
Registered User
 
Raddy21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 1,137
Trader Rating: (5)
Quote:
Originally Posted by OwAce
previously ANY alteration of the stock headlamps was illegal. now as long as it meets the photometric (or something of that sort) geometry of the original stock lamp its perfectly lega.
So come on...explain the photometric geometry. You know that you know what that means. Just like you're a camber and cooking expert
Raddy21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2005, 07:31 AM   #8
kramer2k
ex scientia vera
 
kramer2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,100
Trader Rating: (4)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raddy21
So come on...explain the photometric geometry. You know that you know what that means. Just like you're a camber and cooking expert





BTW Owace, you probably should have posted this in the General Discussion forum. The 7th Genners can't hoard all of the insider info.
kramer2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2005, 07:58 AM   #9
littodevil
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 575
Trader Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to littodevil
Wow now this is great news!!! Not just the fact that my headlight conversion are legal (gonna research more on this) but it's great over all Well sticking an hid kit into a halogen housing still isn't legal most of the time since you wont get the same light output and spread as required. However properly mounting a factory hid projector is fine, since the output wont be altered and it orginally came from another hid factory equipped vehicle that already past all lighting and integrity test required.

Woot woot!!!

Larry
littodevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2005, 09:41 PM   #10
v6_ccord_2k5
oSCaR
 
v6_ccord_2k5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 4,924
Trader Rating: (4)
Quote:
Originally Posted by littodevil
Wow now this is great news!!! Not just the fact that my headlight conversion are legal (gonna research more on this) but it's great over all Well sticking an hid kit into a halogen housing still isn't legal most of the time since you wont get the same light output and spread as required. However properly mounting a factory hid projector is fine, since the output wont be altered and it orginally came from another hid factory equipped vehicle that already past all lighting and integrity test required.

Woot woot!!!

Larry

Does this mean we get discounts? j/k
v6_ccord_2k5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2005, 11:01 PM   #11
aznfunkyflip
New Member
 
aznfunkyflip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northridge, CA
Posts: 4,599
Trader Rating: (39)
Send a message via Yahoo to aznfunkyflip
ummmm ... how we gonna convince the cops that those projectors we have in our headlight really came from another car?
aznfunkyflip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 24th, 2006, 05:48 PM   #12
VietNinjaJ30A1
upgraded intake system
 
VietNinjaJ30A1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Austin, TEXAS
Posts: 9,385
Trader Rating: (23)
Carry a heat gun in your trunk. =] -- or you know....the DIY for your retro...whichever.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


VietNinjaJ30A1
2000 Honda Accord V6 Supercharged
Official Slammed Club Member #36 (Stage 1)
VietNinjaJ30A1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 14th, 2006, 10:48 AM   #13
Eloy213
Registered User
 
Eloy213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 127
Trader Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by v6_ccord_2k5
Does this mean we get discounts? j/k
lol...
Eloy213 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump