So I have the AEM V2 and I'm looking to get a hydroshield for it. Only thing I don't know or am not sure of is which one to go with? Anyone have any ideas or input as to which one I should go with?
I have the K&N cover on my aem V2 and it seems to work good. Easy to clean but a pain to get to once its on the car. It can't hurt. I feel it keeps more dirt off of the filter and little bits of water off.
Ah, I was wondering why people were looking into hydrophobic barriers/covers rather as opposed to the bypass valve.
Are the shields even that effective? I cannot see a cover offering much protection against hydrolock in situations where hydrolock is truly even possible.
I believe those shields are meant to keep water off, not out, like droplets of water in rain or splashes. If you drive into a deep puddle, the intake will still suck up the water and you will hydrolock your engine regardless. The AEM bypass valve is a different story though.
Post vids of the tests! Lol... only kidding. DO NOT drive through lakes...
So have many people actually hacked their v2 in order to put on a bypass valve? Wouldn't this change specific diameters and tube lengths that AEM engineered into the v2 to achieve "multiple frequency sound waves tuned to the engine's resonance?" I know there isn't much of a difference between the v1 and v2 (aside from sound), but I figure changing the v2's geometry would be a detriment to the v2 design. I mean, AEM joined the two chambers for a reason. If hydrolock is truly a concern, wouldn't it be simpler just to get a v1 and the bypass valve?
Aem does not recommend putting the bypass valve on the V2.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Accord V6 Forum
1.9M posts
84.8K members
Since 2003
A forum community dedicated to Honda Accord V6 owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about performance, modifications, classifieds, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more!