Something Something Darkside
Per the new Motor Trend (April I believe), computer tests have the car running a 14.5. I forgot the trap as I read it at Walgreen's. Can anyone with a M/T provide more info?
True but the V6 stang does have an abundance of low and mid end torque. Maybe it was an auto? ET still sucks though. What does your Cartest say Steve?SteVTEC said:A 210 hp Mustang V6 does not trap at 101 mph, lol. That sounds like a V8 trap speed with a more V6-ish ET (horrible launch?), or a typo of some sort. something doesn't add up. :gotme:
edit: maybe they're dropping the truck motor and putting their 250hp 3.5L DOHC in there?
trapshot68 said:well, just looked at the little "virtual road test" vid, and it says the camaro is good for a 14.5 sec @ 104.4mph, vs the mustang's 15.1 @ 101.8
messengers are the first to get shot in a war. well not shot but beheaded and sent back on a platter.trapshot68 said:hey guys, don't shoot the messenger. I'm just quoting what Motor Trend put in print. But we all know how mag times are.......
Yep. You sure doDoom said:Ford's stupid enough not to bring it over. And do I have to hear about the Falcon in 4 different threads now.
That's actually my favorite car in Gran Turismo 4 on PS2. :rofl2:FalconXR6 said:You blokes think that's good.
You should take note of the I6 Ford Australia produces.
How does 13.9 sound from an 1800kg four door sedan with a turbo charged 4.0 litre DOHC inline 6 sound? All with an optional ZF 6 speed automatic.
Yep, Ford Australia's 4.0 litre six is king!
Doom said:The closest to a Commodore we have is the Pontiac GTO and I'd love to own one. Of course I'd prefer a 4 door version but they don't have that here.